JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bingen, E H
Right arrow Articles by Elion, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bingen, E H
Right arrow Articles by Elion, J
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 August; 30(8): 2088-2091

Ribotyping provides efficient differentiation of nosocomial Serratia marcescens isolates in a pediatric hospital.

E H Bingen, P Mariani-Kurkdjian, N Y Lambert-Zechovsky, P Desjardins, E Denamur, Y Aujard, E Vilmer and J Elion

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.

ABSTRACT

Ribotyping with a nonradioactive probing system was used for the epidemiological evaluation of 15 Serratia marcescens nosocomial strains isolated from the stools of 12 children with no apparent illness in five different hospital wards over a 20-day period. Our results indicate that the occurrence of S. marcescens colonization was the result of the spread of a single epidemiological strain in the hematology ward, the oncology ward, and the gastroenterology ward and in two neonates in the neonatology ward, suggesting cross-contamination between the patients in these four wards. This isolate was genotypically unrelated to the bacterial strain found in the three other patients in the neonatology ward. Interestingly, one patient in the neonatology ward harbored these two genotypically different strains. Finally, the patient in the intensive care unit was colonized with a different strain. We find ribotyping to be a more reliable technique than biochemical typing. The results of ribotyping are more easily interpreted than are those of total DNA analysis, with an equivalent degree of discrimination.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 August; 30(8): 2088-2091







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.