This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scriver, S R Articles by Jaeger, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scriver, S R Articles by Jaeger, R

Broth microdilution testing of Haemophilus influenzae with haemophilus test medium versus lysed horse blood broth. Canadian Haemophilus Study Group.

Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Broth microdilution testing of 702 community-acquired isolates of Haemophilus influenzae from across Canada was performed with both Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 3% lysed horse blood broth (LHB) (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and haemophilus test medium (HTM). The prevalence of beta-lactamase production was found to be 26% with no regional variation. MICs determined with LHB tended to be higher than those with HTM, but interpretive errors due to these differences were observed only rarely with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (n = 5), cefaclor (n = 8), and cefamandole (n = 3). The interobserver variability in MIC determinations was found to be greater when LHB was used than when HTM was used. There was no difference in intraobserver variability between the two medium formulations. beta-Lactamase-positive isolates developed false resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanate 2 weeks after microdilution panels of both types of medium were stored at -20 degrees C but not when panels were stored at -70 degrees C. In conclusion, this study supports the use of HTM rather than LHB for sensitivity testing of H. influenzae because of its lower rate of interobserver variability and its ability to support the growth of these organisms, which is comparable to that of LHB.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Barry, A. L., Fuchs, P. C., Brown, S. D. (2001). Identification of {beta}-Lactamase-Negative, Ampicillin-Resistant Strains of Haemophilus influenzae with Four Methods and Eight Media. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 1585-1588 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L., Brown, S. D. (2001). Influence of Variations in Test Methods on Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to Ampicillin, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, and Telithromycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 43-46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhanel, G. G., Karlowsky, J. A., Low, D. E., Canadian Respiratory Infection Study Group, t., Hoban, D. J. (2000). Antibiotic resistance in respiratory tract isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis collected from across Canada in 1997-1998. J Antimicrob Chemother 45: 655-662 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Doern, G. V., Jones, R. N., Pfaller, M. A., Kugler, K., The Sentry Participants Group, (1999). Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from Patients with Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 385-389 [Abstract] [Full Text]