JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaye, H H
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaye, H H
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, S
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 September; 30(9): 2323-2329

Cellular and humoral immune responses to rubella virus structural proteins E1, E2, and C.

H H Chaye, C A Mauracher, A J Tingle and S Gillam

Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia Research Center, Vancouver, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Better understanding of cell-mediated immune responses to rubella virus would provide the basis for the development of safe and effective vaccines against rubella and would aid in analysis of the pathophysiology of congenital rubella syndrome. We have expressed individual rubella virus structural proteins, E1, E2 and C, via vaccinia virus recombinants. Using the expressed recombinant proteins as antigens, we were able to demonstrate antigen-specific lymphocyte proliferative responses in control individuals and individuals with congenital rubella syndrome. Among the two human groups studied, E1 glycoprotein proved to be a better immunogen than E2 or C. For the control individuals, significant differences in proliferative responses to the structural proteins E1, E2, and C were observed. These differences were not significant in individuals with congenital rubella syndrome. In parallel to the lymphoproliferative responses, immunoglobulin G responses were also found directed mainly to the E1 glycoprotein. These results suggest that E1 may be the most important rubella virus antigen to study in determining the domains required for constructing subunit vaccines against rubella.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 September; 30(9): 2323-2329




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.