JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mourton, C
Right arrow Articles by Pau, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mourton, C
Right arrow Articles by Pau, B

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 September; 30(9): 2338-2345

Highly sensitive immunoassay for direct diagnosis of viral hemorrhagic septicemia which uses antinucleocapsid monoclonal antibodies.

C Mourton, B Romestand, P de Kinkelin, J Jeffroy, R Le Gouvello and B Pau

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 9921, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France.

ABSTRACT

An antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the detection of the viral nucleocapsid (anti-N system) was developed for the diagnosis of viral hemorrhagic septicemia. Four monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral nucleocapsid were produced; they all recognized the four viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) serotypes. Three of these monoclonal antibodies were used in a new antigen capture ELISA. The efficiency of the anti-N system in detecting purified and crude viruses as well as the virus in infected-organ extracts and infected blood was compared with that of a recently described antigen capture ELISA based on the detection of viral envelope glycoprotein Gp (anti-G system). For the detection of purified virus, the anti-N system was found to be as sensitive as the anti-G system (detection limit, 1 ng of total viral protein per ml), but the anti-N system was much more sensitive than the anti-G system for the detection of crude VHSV I (detection limits, 1 x 10(4) PFU/ml versus 5 x 10(5) PFU/ml). In organ extracts, VHSV I could be detected by both systems 3 days postinfection. The signal for the assay of VHSV I in blood 24 h postinfection was higher with the anti-N system than the anti-G system. Furthermore, VHSV I could be detected in 80% of the brain samples of surviving trout by the anti-N system and also by the anti-G system, but with a lower signal. In conclusion, we have developed a highly sensitive immunoassay for VHSV I that is more rapid and easier to perform than the currently used plaque assay.


J Clin Microbiol. 1992 September; 30(9): 2338-2345




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.