This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cevenini, R Articles by Negosanti, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cevenini, R Articles by Negosanti, M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 September; 30(9): 2456-2461

Surface immunofluorescence assay for diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Institute of Microbiology, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy.

ABSTRACT

A surface immunofluorescence assay (SIFA) was analyzed and compared with a conventional indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and whole-cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in sera from patients with Lyme disease. Fifty-five patients with syphilis and 33 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were used as disease controls. The sensitivity of the SIFA was low during the acute phase of Lyme disease (sera from seven of nine patients presenting with erythema chronicum migrans were negative during the first 2 months of illness); later, seroconversion was observed in all patients at various times during convalescence. Sera from five patients with complicated Lyme disease were strongly positive. SIFA was found to be highly specific, since sera from all patients with secondary or latent syphilis and patients with rheumatoid arthritis did not react in the test. Strong cross-reactivity occurred when these sera were tested in conventional IFA and ELISA; sera from 38 (69%) patients with syphilis were positive by IFA and sera from 51 (93%) patients were positive by ELISA, whereas 7 (21%) and 12 (36%) of the serum samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis were positive by IFA and ELISA, respectively. Immunoblot analysis of SIFA-positive sera showed that the 31- and 34-kDa outer surface proteins (proteins A and B, respectively) of B. burgdorferi were the major reactive antigens involved in the test. The results support a role for SIFA in the investigation of complicated Lyme disease as well as in the differentiation of Lyme disease from other diseases associated with B. burgdorferi cross-reactive antibodies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Marangoni, A., Sparacino, M., Cavrini, F., Storni, E., Mondardini, V., Sambri, V., Cevenini, R. (2005). Comparative evaluation of three different ELISA methods for the diagnosis of early culture-confirmed Lyme disease in Italy. J Med Microbiol 54: 361-367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marangoni, A., Aldini, R., Sambri, V., Montagnani, M., Ballardini, G., Storni, E., Cevenini, R. (2000). Uptake and Killing of Leptospira interrogans and Borrelia burgdorferi, Spirochetes Pathogenic to Humans, by Reticuloendothelial Cells in Perfused Rat Liver. Infect. Immun. 68: 5408-5411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marangoni, A., Sambri, V., Storni, E., D'Antuono, A., Negosanti, M., Cevenini, R. (2000). Treponema pallidum Surface Immunofluorescence Assay for Serologic Diagnosis of Syphilis. CVI 7: 417-421 [Abstract] [Full Text]