JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frank, U K
Right arrow Articles by Ng, V L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frank, U K
Right arrow Articles by Ng, V L
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 January; 31(1): 97-101

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid.

U K Frank, S L Nishimura, N C Li, K Sugai, D M Yajko, W K Hadley and V L Ng

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

ABSTRACT

The Premier enzyme immunoassay (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) was compared with a latex agglutination assay (CALAS; Meridian) for the ability to detect cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen (CrAg) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A total of 594 specimens (471 serum samples and 123 CSF samples) obtained from 430 patients, most of whom were at risk for or had AIDS, were tested in parallel by both systems. Both tests were independently evaluated for their ability to (i) detect CrAg when used as a screening test and (ii) quantitate the CrAg present when used as a titration assay. Chart review to assess clinical outcome after the time of specimen collection was conducted for all patients. When both assays were used as screening assays, 103 serum samples and 18 CSF samples were positive and 356 serum samples and 104 CSF specimens were negative by both assays (97.8% concordance). Thirteen specimens (12 serum samples, 1 CSF sample) gave discrepant screening results. When the tests were used as semiquantitative assays for titer determinations, the CrAg titers determined by the enzyme immunoassay were generally higher than those obtained with the latex agglutination assay. In summary, results obtained with the enzyme immunoassay correlated well with those obtained with the latex agglutination test for screening for the presence of CrAg and for determining the titer of CrAg in serum or CSF.


J Clin Microbiol. 1993 January; 31(1): 97-101




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.