JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bass, C A
Right arrow Articles by Bondi, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bass, C A
Right arrow Articles by Bondi, J M
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 October; 31(10): 2648-2653

Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

C A Bass, D L Jungkind, N S Silverman and J M Bondi

Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

ABSTRACT

A clinical evaluation of the Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) is described. This new clinical system used one-step sample preparation, amplification with biotinylated cryptic plasmid primer pairs (CP24-CP27), uracil-N-glycosylase (AmpErase), and a microtiter format for amplicon capture and detection. Culture with McCoy cells in duplicate 1-dram (3.697-ml) vials with fluorescent immunostaining was the reference system. Endocervical swab samples from 945 women provided 74 culture-positive specimens, of which PCR detected 71. The initial PCR result was positive for 12 additional specimens. Arbitration of the PCR-positive, culture-negative samples by PCR with major outer membrane protein primers, duplicate culture, elementary body direct fluorescent-antibody staining, and DNA extraction PCR showed that all 12 samples were positive for chlamydia, raising the number of truly positive samples from 74 to 86. After arbitration the true sensitivities of PCR and culture were 96.5 and 86%, respectively (P = 0.02). Specificities for both were 100%. For PCR, the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 99.7%, respectively. Total test efficiency was 99.7%. A high-test-volume (121 samples) timing study with all items included in the College of American Pathologists work load method indicated that this PCR format took approximately 3 min per sample. Because of the high sensitivity, specificity, and improved ease of handling, we found PCR to be a good alternative to culture for detection of C. trachomatis.

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 October; 31(10): 2648-2653




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.