This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sewell, D L Articles by Pfaller, M A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sewell, D L Articles by Pfaller, M A

Comparison of the Septi-Chek AFB and BACTEC systems and conventional culture for recovery of mycobacteria.

Laboratory Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.

ABSTRACT

The performance of the Septi-Chek AFB system was compared with that of the BACTEC radiometric system and that of Lowenstein-Jensen agar slants (LJ) for detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. A total of 642 specimens were cultured; 61 (9.5%) yielded mycobacteria. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (34 isolates) and Mycobacterium avium complex (25 isolates) were the predominant species isolated. Of the 61 culture-positive specimens, 30 were smear positive and 31 were smear negative. Overall, 95% of the positive specimens were detected by Septi-Chek and BACTEC (100% of M. tuberculosis isolates) and 75% by LJ (82% of M. tuberculosis isolates). The mean times to detection were 15 days for BACTEC, 23 days for Septi-Chek, and 27 days for LJ. Of the 30 smear-positive specimens, 100% were recovered by Septi-Chek and BACTEC and 90% were recovered by LJ. Of the 31 smear-negative specimens, 90% were detected by Septi-Chek and BACTEC and 61% were detected by LJ. The Septi-Chek and BACTEC systems are superior to the conventional (LJ) mycobacterial culture method. Although Septi-Chek requires more time for the detection of mycobacteria than BACTEC, it is comparable in terms of overall recovery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Somerville, W., Thibert, L., Schwartzman, K., Behr, M. A. (2005). Extraction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA: a Question of Containment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2996-2997 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Watterson, S A, Drobniewski, F A (2000). Modern laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. J. Clin. Pathol. 53: 727-732 [Abstract] [Full Text]