JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauwens, J E
Right arrow Articles by Stamm, W E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauwens, J E
Right arrow Articles by Stamm, W E
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 November; 31(11): 3023-3027

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

J E Bauwens, A M Clark and W E Stamm

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

ABSTRACT

We evaluated a prototype polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay for Chlamydia trachomatis developed by Roche Molecular Systems to detect endocervical infection in women. Of 587 endocervical samples obtained from women attending the Harborview Medical Center sexually transmitted diseases clinic, 58 (10%) were positive for C. trachomatis by cell culture. Compared with culture, the PCR method had a sensitivity of 88% (51 of 58) and a specificity of 99.2% (525 of 529). The positive and negative predictive values were 92.7% (51 of 55) and 98.7% (525 of 532), respectively. After resolution of discrepant results whereby true positives were considered to be either culture-positive patients (58 patients) or culture-negative patients positive upon PCR analysis using both plasmid- and major outer membrane protein-based primers (4 patients), the resolved sensitivities of the PCR and culture were 89 and 93%, respectively. We subsequently performed a second analysis of 362 women, comparing the proposed commercial PCR assay from Roche Molecular Systems with chlamydia cultures. Thirty (8%) women were infected with C. trachomatis. Compared with culture, the assay had a sensitivity of 60% (18 of 30) and a specificity of 99% (328 of 332). Repeat PCR assay done 2 to 5 days later subsequently yielded positive results for 7 of 11 PCR-negative samples from culture-positive women. We conclude that the Roche Molecular Systems PCR assay provides highly specific results compared with culture in a high-risk population of women. Further study is needed, however, to more clearly define the sensitivity of the PCR assay in detecting endocervical C. trachomatis infection in women and to identify factors that may compromise sensitivity.

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 November; 31(11): 3023-3027




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.