JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lariviere, S
Right arrow Articles by Martineau, G P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lariviere, S
Right arrow Articles by Martineau, G P
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 February; 31(2): 364-367

Comparison of isolation methods for the recovery of Bordetella bronchiseptica and Pasteurella multocida from the nasal cavities of piglets.

S Lariviere, L Leblanc, K R Mittal and G P Martineau

Groupe de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses du Porc, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Nasal swabs from 241 piglets from 12 herds with clinical atrophic rhinitis and 283 piglets from 14 herds without clinical atrophic rhinitis were examined for the presence of Bordetella bronchiseptica and/or Pasteurella multocida. For B. bronchiseptica, swabs were streaked on three selective media. Blood agar supplemented with cephalexin was the most satisfactory selective culture medium for the isolation of B. bronchiseptica. For P. multocida, swabs were also streaked on three selective media. Mice were also used for isolation of P. multocida from the nasal cavities of pigs. The mouse inoculation test was not found to be the definitive test for the isolation of P. multocida. A significant number of P. multocida strains were avirulent in the mouse model. The modified Knight medium (without potassium tellurite) was the best single method for isolating P. multocida. However, a combination of mouse passage and direct culture on selective media increased the rate of isolation. There was no marked difference in the prevalence of B. bronchiseptica or P. multocida in swine herds with or without clinical atrophic rhinitis. Both capsular types A and D were present in the nasal cavities of the pigs with or without clinical atrophic rhinitis.


J Clin Microbiol. 1993 February; 31(2): 364-367







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.