This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shariff, M Articles by Kumar, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shariff, M Articles by Kumar, R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 February; 31(2): 386-389

Evaluation of the fluorescence actin staining test for detection of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

ABSTRACT

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strains designated on the basis of their serotypes are epidemiologically associated with diarrhea. They adhere to the intestinal mucosa, producing the characteristic attaching and effacing (AE) lesion in an in vitro organ culture system. EPEC manifest localized adherence (LA) in the HEp-2 cell assay, and this is commonly used for clinical diagnosis. Recently, the fluorescence actin staining (FAS) test was proposed for the identification of E. coli causing the AE lesion. We therefore compared the FAS test with the HEp-2 cell assay and the EPEC adherence factor (EAF) probe assay for the detection of EPEC strains. Among 240 stool samples from children with diarrhea examined, 176 yielded E. coli and 14 of these strains showed the LA pattern in the HEp-2 cell assay; 11 of these were positive by both the EAF and the FAS tests. By using the HEp-2 cell assay as the "gold standard," the FAS test gave a sensitivity of 78.5% and a specificity of 100%. The three localized adherent FAS-negative strains tested subsequently were positive by the enteroaggregative E. coli DNA Probe and failed to produce the AE lesions characteristic of EPEC. When these strains were not considered, the sensitivity of the FAS test for detecting isolates that manifest LA was 100%. Against the EAF probe, the sensitivity and specificity of the FAS test were 91.6 and 100%, respectively. The FAS test avoids infrequent but nevertheless important phenotypic misclassifications in the HEp-2 cell assay, and it may therefore serve as a confirmatory test for EPEC.