JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, Q
Right arrow Articles by Viljanen, M K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, Q
Right arrow Articles by Viljanen, M K
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 March; 31(3): 642-645

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction with culture and enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of pertussis.

Q He, J Mertsola, H Soini, M Skurnik, O Ruuskanen and M K Viljanen

National Public Health Institute, Department in Turku, Finland.

ABSTRACT

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay amplifying a segment of a repeated gene element of Bordetella pertussis was compared with culture and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the diagnosis of pertussis. The PCR assay was specific for B. pertussis in tests with a panel of other bacteria and with an extensive collection of specimen material from healthy persons and children with respiratory infections other than pertussis. The PCR assay was used in the analysis of 117 nasopharyngeal swabs collected from children at an elementary school at which a pertussis outbreak occurred. Fifty-six (48%) of the 117 swabs were positive, including those for all six culture-positive cases. The PCR method was then applied to analyze another pertussis outbreak. Of 40 nasopharyngeal aspirates taken from 37 clinically susceptible pertussis patients and from three asymptomatic contacts, the PCR identified 18 (45%), including all 3 culture-positive and 5 (35%) of the 14 seropositive patients. The most consistent and reliable diagnosis by positive PCR result was observed with those patients experiencing symptoms within 1 to 6 weeks of sample collection. We conclude that PCR is a rapid, sensitive, and specific means of diagnosing pertussis, especially during the first weeks of disease. The assay can be performed with both nasopharyngeal swabs and aspirates.


J Clin Microbiol. 1993 March; 31(3): 642-645




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.