JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K H
Right arrow Articles by Yamazaki, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K H
Right arrow Articles by Yamazaki, S
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May; 31(5): 1160-1166

Molecular epidemiology of a variant of coxsackievirus A24 in Taiwan: two epidemics caused by phylogenetically distinct viruses from 1985 to 1989.

K H Lin, H L Wang, M M Sheu, W L Huang, C W Chen, C S Yang, N Takeda, N Kato, K Miyamura and S Yamazaki

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kaohsiung Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

ABSTRACT

In order to know the phylogenetic relationship and the route of transmission of a variant of coxsackievirus A24 (CA24v), an agent that caused four sequential outbreaks of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis from 1985 to 1989 in Taiwan, the nucleotide sequence variations in the virus-encoded proteinase 3C region (549 nucleotides) were studied with 19 isolates. The prototype strain (EH24/70), four isolates from Japan, and two isolates from Hong Kong were used for comparison. The nucleotide sequences of the Taiwan strains from the 1985-1986 and 1988-1989 epidemics were closely related within each epidemic, while they were more distantly related between strains from two epidemics. Phylogenetic analysis by the unweighted pairwise grouping method of the arithmetic average revealed that the 19 Taiwan isolates had diverged into two groups, 1985-1986 and 1988-1989 groups. The time at which these two groups diverged was estimated to be around May 1982, more than 3 years prior to the first appearance of the CA24v epidemic in Taiwan. On each occasion, the viruses caused a 2-year epidemic and then disappeared. The Taiwan isolates from 1985 to 1986 were closely related to the Japan isolates from 1985 to 1986 and the Taiwan isolates from 1988 to 1989 were phylogenetically close to the 1989 Japan isolates, indicating that Taiwan and Japan had two common-source outbreaks. However, none of the 1988 Taiwan isolates were phylogenetically close to the 1988 Japan or Hong Kong isolates. The evidence revealed that Taiwan has had two repeated but discontinuous introductions of CA24v since its first appearance in Taiwan in 1985. None of the other CA24v strains have been detected so far.


J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May; 31(5): 1160-1166




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.