This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by François, M Articles by Barin, F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by François, M Articles by Barin, F

Prevalence and significance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia in HCV antibody-positive subjects from various populations.

Département de Microbiologie Médicale et Moléculaire, URA 1334, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is currently assessed by detection of antibodies to HCV with immunoassays. However, in the absence of an in vitro system to isolate the virus, or an immunoassay to identify HCV antigen in blood, an ongoing acute or chronic HCV infection can be diagnosed only by detection of HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction. We used a reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction to detect an HCV 5' noncoding viral RNA sequence in serum specimens collected from anti-HCV-positive individuals belonging to different risk groups and compared the results with those obtained with a prototype recombinant immunoblot assay (Chiron HCV SIA prototype recombinant immunoblot assay [RIBA]) containing four different viral peptides (c22, c33c, c100, and NS5). The prevalence of HCV viremia ranged from 25.9% in HCV antibody-positive blood donors to 92% in HCV antibody-positive hemophiliacs. Elevated alanine aminotransferase values in HCV antibody-positive patients were clearly associated with viremia. Ninety-six percent of HCV RNA-positive patients reacted to two viral antigens or more, compared with only 64% of HCV RNA-negative patients. Contrary to previous reports, HCV viremia was not associated with either the presence or the absence of a particular antibody specificity. The newly introduced NS5 peptide did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of the RIBA. Although 20% of the patients in our study whose sera reacted to all of the antigens were HCV RNA negative, the positive predictive value of a RIBA considered positive by the manufacturer (two or more bands), was rather high (78%) and may allow suspicion of viremia in EIA2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-positive patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• BDOUR, S. (2002). Hepatitis C virus infection in Jordanian haemodialysis units: serological diagnosis and genotyping. J Med Microbiol 51: 700-704 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pogam, S. L., Gondeau, A., Bacq, Y. (1999). Nosocomial Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus. ANN INTERN MED 131: 794-794 [Full Text]  
• Le Pogam, S., Le Chapois, D., Christen, R., Dubois, F., Barin, F., Goudeau, A. (1998). Hepatitis C in a Hemodialysis Unit: Molecular Evidence for Nosocomial Transmission. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 3040-3043 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Le Pogam, S., Dubois, F., Christen, R., Raby, C., Cavicchini, A., Goudeau, A. (1998). Comparison of DNA Enzyme Immunoassay and Line Probe Assays (Inno-LiPA HCV I and II) for Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1461-1463 [Abstract] [Full Text]