This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maher, W E Articles by Fass, R J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maher, W E Articles by Fass, R J

Restriction endonuclease analysis of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: useful epidemiologic data from a simple and rapid method.

Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus 43210-1228.

ABSTRACT

Newer genetic techniques have replaced phenotypic methods of subtyping Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Widespread application of newer methodologies, however, may be limited by technologic complexity and the cost of equipment. We conducted restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) of sheared genomic DNAs from 48 clinical P. aeruginosa strains using the enzyme SalI and electrophoresis in horizontal, low-concentration (0.3 to 0.6%) agarose gels. Each REA profile consisted of a smear of lower-molecular-mass bands as well as a countable number of well-resolved bands in the 8.3- to 48.5-kbp range which could easily be compared when isolates were run side-by-side on the same gel. In general, the REA patterns of strains recovered from different patients differed by at least seven bands, and those of serial isolates from individual patients were identical or differed by, at most, two bands over this 8.3- to 48.5-kbp range. REA of strains already subtyped by field inversion gel electrophoresis revealed that the two techniques generally paralleled each other. Overall, some unrelated strains had similar REA profiles, but the relative simplicity and low cost of the approach coupled with the ability to demonstrate differences between most unrelated strains should make this type of REA an attractive first step in the investigation of institutional P. aeruginosa problems.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Al-Samarrai, T. H., Zhang, N., Lamont, I. L., Martin, L., Kolbe, J., Wilsher, M., Morris, A. J., Schmid, J. (2000). Simple and Inexpensive but Highly Discriminating Method for Computer-Assisted DNA Fingerprinting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 4445-4452 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hanna, S. L., Sherman, N. E., Kinter, M. T., Goldberg, J. B. (2000). Comparison of proteins expressed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains representing initial and chronic isolates from a cystic fibrosis patient: an analysis by 2-D gel electrophoresis and capillary column liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Microbiology 146: 2495-2508 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Martin, C., Boyd, E. F., Quentin, R., Massicot, P., Selander, R. K. (1999). Enzyme polymorphism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains recovered from cystic fibrosis patients in France. Microbiology 145: 2587-2594 [Abstract] [Full Text]