This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tenover, F C Articles by Jarvis, W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tenover, F C Articles by Jarvis, W

Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

Nosocomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

ABSTRACT

To test the ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial resistance among enterococci, we sent four vancomycin-resistant enterococcal strains and one beta-lactamase-producing enterococcus to all 93 nongovernment, hospital-based clinical laboratories in New Jersey; 76 (82%) participated in the study. Each organism was tested by the laboratory's routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing method. The proportion of laboratories that correctly reported that an isolate was resistant to vancomycin varied according to the resistance level of the isolate: high-level resistance (MIC for Enterococcus faecium = 512 micrograms/ml), 96% of laboratories correct; moderate-level resistance (MIC for E. faecium = 64 micrograms/ml), 27% correct; low-level resistance (MIC for Enterococcus faecalis = 32 micrograms/ml), 16% correct; and intrinsic low-level resistance (MIC for Enterococcus gallinarum = 8 micrograms/ml), 74% correct. The beta-lactamase-producing E. faecalis isolate was identified as resistant to penicillin and ampicillin by 66 and 8% of laboratories, respectively, but only three laboratories recognized that it was a beta-lactamase producer. This survey suggests that many laboratories may fail to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ligozzi, M., Bernini, C., Bonora, M. G., de Fatima, M., Zuliani, J., Fontana, R. (2002). Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Medically Relevant Gram-Positive Cocci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1681-1686 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Snell, J. J. S., Brown, D. F. J. (2001). External quality assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 801-810 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tenover, F. C., Mohammed, M. J., Stelling, J., O'Brien, T., Williams, R. (2001). Ability of Laboratories To Detect Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance: Proficiency Testing and Quality Control Results from the World Health Organization's External Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 241-250 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cetinkaya, Y., Falk, P., Mayhall, C. G. (2000). Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 686-707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kiehlbauch, J. A., Hannett, G. E., Salfinger, M., Archinal, W., Monserrat, C., Carlyn, C. (2000). Use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Guidelines for Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing in New York State Laboratories. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3341-3348 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alonso-Echanove, J., Robles, B., Jarvis, W. R., The Spanish VRE Study Group, (1999). Proficiency of Clinical Laboratories in Spain in Detecting Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 2148-2152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Patel, R., Piper, K. E., Rouse, M. S., Steckelberg, J. M., Uhl, J. R., Kohner, P., Hopkins, M. K., Cockerill, F. R. III, Kline, B. C. (1998). Determination of 16S rRNA Sequences of Enterococci and Application to Species Identification of Nonmotile Enterococcus gallinarum Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 3399-3407 [Abstract] [Full Text]