This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mahony, J B Articles by Chernesky, M A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mahony, J B Articles by Chernesky, M A

Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids.

McMaster University Regional Virology and Chlamydiology Laboratory, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Several laboratories have demonstrated that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is more sensitive than culture or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens when various DNA targets are used for amplification, including the cryptic plasmid, major outer membrane protein (MOMP), or rRNA genes. We compared the performances of five different PCR assays, including assays with two plasmid, two MOMP, and one rRNA targets, by amplifying serial dilutions of C. trachomatis DNA and testing genitourinary tract specimens. By using published procedures, two different plasmid primers had sensitivities of 0.1 fg for C. trachomatis plasmid DNA and 10 fg for total cellular DNA. The sensitivities of the assays with the two MOMP primers were 0.1 and 10 pg, and the sensitivity for the assay with the rRNA primers was 1 pg for cellular DNA. Both plasmid-based assays detected 38 of 38 confirmed Chlamydiazyme-positive specimens, whereas the assays with the MOMP and rRNA primers detected 36 of 38 and 29 of 38 confirmed Chlamydiazyme-positive specimens, respectively. Six of 18 Chlamydiazyme-negative specimens collected from individuals whose specimens were positive by culture or immunofluorescence were positive by both plasmid-based PCRs; 4 of these were positive by PCR with the MOMP primers and 3 were positive by PCR with the rRNA primers. The results obtained with both purified DNA and genitourinary tract specimens indicated that the plasmid-based PCRs are more sensitive than bacterial chromosome-based PCRs for detecting C. trachomatis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Porter, M., Mak, D., Chidlow, G., Harnett, G. B., Smith, D. W. (2008). The Molecular Epidemiology of Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Western Australia: Implications for Trachoma Control. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 514-517 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Quint, K. D., van Doorn, L.-J., Kleter, B., de Koning, M. N.C., van den Munckhof, H. A.M., Morre, S. A., ter Harmsel, B., Weiderpass, E., Harbers, G., Melchers, W. J.G., Quint, W. G.V. (2007). A Highly Sensitive, Multiplex Broad-Spectrum PCR-DNA-Enzyme Immunoassay and Reverse Hybridization Assay for Rapid Detection and Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars. J. Mol. Diagn. 9: 631-638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Magbanua, J. P. V, Goh, B. T., Michel, C.-E., Aguirre-Andreasen, A., Alexander, S., Ushiro-Lumb, I., Ison, C., Lee, H. (2007). Chlamydia trachomatis variant not detected by plasmid based nucleic acid amplification tests: molecular characterisation and failure of single dose azithromycin. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 339-343 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jaton, K., Bille, J., Greub, G. (2006). A novel real-time PCR to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine or genital swabs.. J Med Microbiol 55: 1667-1674 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hsu, M.-C., Tsai, P.-Y., Chen, K.-T., Li, L.-H., Chiang, C.-C., Tsai, J.-J., Ke, L.-Y., Chen, H.-Y., Li, S.-Y. (2006). Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens in Taiwan.. J Med Microbiol 55: 301-308 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jalal, H, Stephen, H, Al-Suwaine, A, Sonnex, C, Carne, C (2006). The superiority of polymerase chain reaction over an amplified enzyme immunoassay for the detection of genital chlamydial infections. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 37-40 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Solomon, A. W., Peeling, R. W., Foster, A., Mabey, D. C. W. (2004). Diagnosis and Assessment of Trachoma. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 982-1011 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stevens, M. P., Tabrizi, S. N., Muller, R., Krause, V., Garland, S. M. (2004). Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 Genotypes Detected in Eye Swab Samples from Remote Australian Communities. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 2501-2507 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hosseinzadeh, S., Eley, A., Pacey, A. A. (2004). Semen Quality of Men With Asymptomatic Chlamydial Infection. J Androl 25: 104-109 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Javaloy, J, Ferrer, C, Vidal, M T, Alio, J L (2003). Follicular conjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis in an infant Saharan population: molecular and clinical diagnosis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87: 142-146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Garrow, S C, Smith, D W, Harnett, G B (2002). The diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and trichomonas infections by self obtained low vaginal swabs, in remote northern Australian clinical practice. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: 278-281 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jurstrand, M., Falk, L., Fredlund, H., Lindberg, M., Olcen, P., Andersson, S., Persson, K., Albert, J., Backman, A. (2001). Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 Genotypes among Sexually Transmitted Disease Patients in Sweden. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3915-3919 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pedersen, L. N., Kjær, H. O., Møller, J. K., Ørntoft, T. F., Ostergaard, L. (2000). High-Resolution Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from Recurrent Urogenital Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3068-3071 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mahony, J. B., Chong, S., Coombes, B. K., Smieja, M., Petrich, A. (2000). Analytical Sensitivity, Reproducibility of Results, and Clinical Performance of Five PCR Assays for Detecting Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2622-2627 [Abstract] [Full Text]