This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roggen, E L Articles by Piot, P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roggen, E L Articles by Piot, P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 July; 31(7): 1820-1825

Antigen detection and immunological typing of Haemophilus ducreyi with a specific rabbit polyclonal serum.

Department of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

ABSTRACT

A rabbit polyclonal serum was raised against the 29-kDa species-specific marker, as well as the 30- to 34-kDa immunotype-specific markers of Haemophilus ducreyi described elsewhere (E. Roggen, S. De Breucker, E. Van Dyck, and P. Piot, Infect. Immun. 60:590-595, 1992). These antigens were purified from a cocktail of H. ducreyi isolates by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The immune serum reacted in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preferentially with H. ducreyi, at a titer as high as 50,000. To make it specific to H. ducreyi, nonspecific antibodies were removed by adsorption on a mixture of Haemophilus spp., Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Corynebacterium spp. In the 29- to 34-kDa region of immunoblot profiles from H. ducreyi isolates (n = 450), the adsorbed serum revealed essentially the same antigens as did a pool of well-characterized human sera. Yet, eight different immunotypes were observed. With this rabbit polyclonal serum, an ELISA-based antigen detection test was developed. The adsorbed serum reacted specifically with all H. ducreyi isolates tested (n = 450), but not with other bacterial species (n = 15). This test was evaluated with a limited number of clinical specimens from African patients with culture-proven chancroid and no evidence for any other ulcerating etiology (n = 10) and a number of chancroid-negative control patients from Belgium (n = 20). Within this context, the test yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.