JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, C
Right arrow Articles by Trépo, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, C
Right arrow Articles by Trépo, C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 January; 32(1): 211-212

Serological responses to different genotypes of hepatitis C virus in France.

C Alonso, D Qu, J P Lamelin, S de Sanjosé, L Vitvitski, J Li, F Berby, V Lambert, M L Cortey and C Trépo

Unité de Recherche sur les Hepatites, le SIDA et les Retrovirus Humains, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Lyon, France.

ABSTRACT

The relationship between hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and antibody status was studied in 104 chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis patients and asymptomatic HCV-infected blood donors. On the basis of amplification of the nonstructural protein 3 (NS3) coding region by PCR and hybridization with specific probes, 55 and 42 patients were identified as being infected with type I and type II, respectively, according to the classification by H. Okamoto, K. Kurai, S. Okada, K. Yamamoto, H. Lizuka, T. Tanaka, S. Fukuda, F. Tsudaand, and S. Mishiro (Virology 188:331-341, 1992). All samples were tested for antibodies to 5.1.1, C-100, C-33, and C-22 proteins by a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay. Among 97 patients with known HCV genotypes, 31 of 42 patients infected with type II and 24 of 55 infected with type I had antibodies against all four antigens (P < 0.01). In the type II-infected group, more patients had detectable antibodies to 5.11, C-33, and C-22 proteins than in the type I group (P < 0.05). No difference was found in the serological response to C-100 between the two groups.

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 January; 32(1): 211-212




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.