This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dasen, S E Articles by Stull, T L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dasen, S E Articles by Stull, T L

Characterization of PCR-ribotyping for Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia.

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19129.

ABSTRACT

Ribotyping, a method of genotyping bacterial isolates for epidemiologic study, uses rRNA as a probe to detect chromosomal restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Although ribotyping is accurate, its utility is limited by the labor and time necessary for Southern blot analysis. PCR-ribotyping uses PCR to amplify the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region of the bacterial rRNA operon. Length heterogeneity in the spacer region has previously been found to be useful as an alternative to standard ribotyping in a study of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia. To further analyze the accuracy of PCR-ribotyping, three groups of previously characterized isolates of B. cepacia were investigated. PCR-ribotyping grouped 90 isolates recovered from seven well-defined epidemics into the correct outbreak group with a mean concordance of 93%. Both standard ribotyping and PCR-ribotyping separated 15 unrelated isolates into 14 types. In an analysis of 83 B. cepacia isolates from chronically colonized cystic fibrosis patients, the concordance of PCR-ribotyping with standard ribotyping ranged from 83 to 100%, with a mean of 98%. One isolate from a chronically colonized patient had a different type by standard ribotyping but was identical to the other isolates from this patient by PCR-ribotyping. Thus, PCR-ribotyping is a rapid and accurate method for typing B. cepacia and is less labor intensive than standard ribotyping.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Henry, D. A., Mahenthiralingam, E., Vandamme, P., Coenye, T., Speert, D. P. (2001). Phenotypic Methods for Determining Genomovar Status of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1073-1078 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brisse, S., Verduin, C. M., Milatovic, D., Fluit, A., Verhoef, J., Laevens, S., Vandamme, P., Tümmler, B., Verbrugh, H. A., van Belkum, A. (2000). Distinguishing Species of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex and Burkholderia gladioli by Automated Ribotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 1876-1884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Segonds, C., Heulin, T., Marty, N., Chabanon, G. (1999). Differentiation of Burkholderia Species by PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of the 16S rRNA Gene and Application to Cystic Fibrosis Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 2201-2208 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ledson, M J, Gallagher, M J, Corkill, J E, Hart, C A, Walshaw, M J (1998). Cross infection between cystic fibrosis patients colonised with Burkholderia cepacia. Thorax 53: 432-436 [Abstract] [Full Text]