JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plikaytis, B D
Right arrow Articles by Carlone, G M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plikaytis, B D
Right arrow Articles by Carlone, G M
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 October; 32(10): 2441-2447

Determination of parallelism and nonparallelism in bioassay dilution curves.

B D Plikaytis, P F Holder, L B Pais, S E Maslanka, L L Gheesling and G M Carlone

Biostatistics and Information Management Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

ABSTRACT

There is a lack of consensus among investigators who use a variety of immunoassay techniques (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and radioimmunoassay) regarding the protocols for describing and forming standard reference or calibration curves and interpolating serum antibody concentrations. This confounds the issue of detecting the presence or absence of parallelism between standard reference serum and serially diluted serum sample curves. These curves must be parallel to support the assumption that the antibody-binding characteristics are similar enough to allow the determination of antibody levels in the diluted serum sample. There is no universal and widely adopted strategy for assessing parallelism in bioassays, and without an assurance of parallelism, investigators are not able to calculate reliable estimates for antibody concentrations in serum samples. Furthermore, single-point (dilution) serum assays do not provide information related to parallelism and nonparallelism, and this, too, may lead to considerable error when calculating antibody concentrations. When assay methodology, technique, and precision improve to the extent that standard reference serum and serially diluted serum sample curves are fit with little error, standard analysis of variance techniques are overly sensitive to negligible departures from parallelism. We present a series of guidelines that compose a protocol for assessing parallelism between bioassay dilution curves that are applicable to data derived from ELISAs. These criteria should be applicable, with minor modifications, to most immunoassay experimental situations and, most importantly, are not dependent on the mathematical model used to form the standard reference curve. These guidelines have evolved in our laboratories over the past 4 years during the performance of thousands of ELISAs for antibodies to the capsular polysaccharides of Neisseria meningitidis groups A and C and Haemophilus influenzae type b.

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 October; 32(10): 2441-2447




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.