JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, M G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, M G
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 October; 32(10): 2494-2500

Comparative study of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' proposed standard.

F Barchiesi, A L Colombo, D A McGough and M G Rinaldi

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7750.

ABSTRACT

A comparative study of broth macro- and microdilution methods for susceptibility testing of fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B was conducted with 273 yeasts. The clinical isolates included 100 Candida albicans, 28 Candida tropicalis, 25 Candida parapsilosis, 15 Candida lusitaniae, 15 Candida krusei, 50 Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, 25 Torulopsis (Candida) glabrata, and 15 Trichosporon beigelii strains. Both methods were performed according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' (NCCLS) recommendations (document M27-P). For fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine, the endpoint was the tube that showed 80% growth inhibition compared with the growth control for the macrodilution method and the well with slightly hazy turbidity (score 1) compared with the growth control for the microdilution method. For amphotericin B, the endpoint was the tube and/or well in which there was absence of growth. For the reference macrodilution method, the MICs were determined after 48 h of incubation for Candida spp., T. glabrata, and T. beigelii and after 72 h for C. neoformans var. neoformans. For the microdilution method, either the first-day MICs (24 h for all isolates other than C. neoformans and 48 h for C. neoformans var. neoformans) or the second-day MICs (48 and 72 h, respectively) were evaluated. The agreement within one doubling dilution of the macrodilution reference for all drugs was higher with the second-day MICs than with the first-day MICs for the microdilution test for most of the tested strains. General agreement was 92% for fluconazole, 85.7% for itraconazole, 98.3% for flucytosine, and 96.4% for amphotericin B. For C. neoformans var. neoformans and T. beigelii, the agreement of the first-day reading was higher than that of the second-day reading for fluconazole (94 versus 92%, respectively, for C. neoformans var. neoformans, and 86.7 versus 80%, respectively, for T. beigelii). Our studies indicate that the microdilution technique performed following the NCCLS guidelines with a second-day reading is a valid alternative method for testing fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B against these eight species of yeasts.

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 October; 32(10): 2494-2500




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.