This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, J Articles by Carlson, L G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, J Articles by Carlson, L G

Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures.

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98108.

ABSTRACT

Blood specimens collected for culture by using the high-volume resin-based BACTEC system over an 18-month period at the Seattle Veterans Administration Center were examined in this study. Of 7,783 cultures obtained, 624 were classified as true positives. Patients in this group had between 20 and 60 ml of blood drawn per culture and separated into 10-ml aliquots for incubation. Analysis of the results stratified by cultured volume and time interval between specimen collection accorded yield advantage to culture volume at the maximal amounts tested. No advantage was observed with any particular interval of collection. Increasing cultured volume from 20 to 40 ml increased yield by 19%. Increasing cultured volume from 40 to 60 ml increased yield by an additional 10%. The same effect was seen whether cultures were drawn simultaneously or serially within 24 h. These observations support other reports demonstrating increased yield with increased cultured blood volume. However, they demonstrate increases in yield at volumes much higher than previously considered. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that high-volume blood cultures drawn serially or simultaneously return the best yields.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nicola, F. G., Weinstein, M. P., Lee, A., Reller, L. B., Mirrett, S. (2008). Assessing How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed for Detecting Bloodstream Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1155-1156 [Full Text]  
• Bouza, E., Sousa, D., Rodriguez-Creixems, M., Lechuz, J. G., Munoz, P. (2007). Is the Volume of Blood Cultured Still a Significant Factor in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections?. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2765-2769 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Connell, T. G., Rele, M., Cowley, D., Buttery, J. P., Curtis, N. (2007). How Reliable Is a Negative Blood Culture Result? Volume of Blood Submitted for Culture in Routine Practice in a Children's Hospital. Pediatrics 119: 891-896 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shafazand, S., Weinacker, A. B. (2002). Blood Cultures in the Critical Care Unit: Improving Utilization and Yield. Chest 122: 1727-1736 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Buttery, J P (2002). Blood cultures in newborns and children: optimising an everyday test. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87: F25-28 [Abstract] [Full Text]