JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ossewaarde, J M
Right arrow Articles by van Loon, A M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ossewaarde, J M
Right arrow Articles by van Loon, A M
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 December; 32(12): 2968-2974

Comparison of two panels of monoclonal antibodies for determination of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars.

J M Ossewaarde, M Rieffe, A de Vries, R P Derksen-Nawrocki, H J Hooft, G J van Doornum and A M van Loon

ABSTRACT

A panel of monoclonal antibodies was developed for serovar typing of clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis. The panel could distinguish all 15 established serovars from one another, although the hybridomas of the panel were developed by fusions of myeloma cells and spleen cells from mice immunized with antigen derived from the urogenital serovars D to L3. The typing assay was based on a dot enzyme immunoassay, and the monoclonal antibodies that were included in the panel reacted strongly in this assay. A collection of 289 clinical isolates from The Netherlands was typed. The observed serovar frequency distribution was 51 isolates of serovar D (17.6%), 103 isolates of serovar E (35.6%), 62 isolates of serovar F (21.5%), 28 isolates of serovar G (9.9%), 14 isolates of serovar H (4.8%), 2 isolates of serovar I' (0.7%), 20 isolates of serovar J (6.9%), and 9 isolates of serovar K (3.1%). These results were confirmed by typing these isolates with a panel of monoclonal antibodies purchased from the Washington Research Foundation, Seattle. No strain variation was observed within serovar D with both panels. However, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the gene encoding the major outer membrane protein showed that 32 isolates were similar to the prototype D and 17 were similar to the variant D-. The two others showed a new restriction pattern. Our panel of monoclonal antibodies contained one monoclonal antibody that divided the serovar G isolates into two groups. This differentiation was confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, confining this difference to a known sequence variation in variable domain IV. These data support the subdivision of serovar G into serovars G (prototype strain UW-57) and Ga (prototype strain IOL-238).


J Clin Microbiol. 1994 December; 32(12): 2968-2974




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.