JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cherian, T
Right arrow Articles by Yolken, R H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cherian, T
Right arrow Articles by Yolken, R H
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 March; 32(3): 623-628

Use of PCR-enzyme immunoassay for identification of influenza A virus matrix RNA in clinical samples negative for cultivable virus.

T Cherian, L Bobo, M C Steinhoff, R A Karron and R H Yolken

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

ABSTRACT

Influenza A virus infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Standard diagnostic methods either are not efficient in identifying infected individuals in a timely manner or lack sensitivity. We developed a PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) for the detection of influenza A virus RNA in respiratory secretions. A reverse transcription PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primers directed at a highly conserved area of the influenza A matrix gene. Amplified DNA was identified by hybridization in solution to a nested biotinylated RNA probe and quantitated in an EIA. PCR-EIA detected small quantities of RNA from the three prevalent subtypes of human influenza A virus. Influenza B and C, parainfluenza, measles, mumps, and respiratory syncytial viruses tested negative. The potential efficiency of PCR-EIA for use in clinical diagnosis was determined by testing 90 nasal wash specimens obtained daily over a 10-day period from nine human volunteers infected with influenza A virus. Thirty-seven of the postinfection samples had detectable influenza A virus RNA by PCR-EIA, whereas only 26 postinfection samples were positive by culture. PCR-EIA was particularly efficient for the identification of influenza A virus in samples obtained more than 4 days after infection. Seventeen of 45 such samples were positive, whereas virus was cultivated from 4 samples (P < 0.00005). All preinfection samples from volunteers subsequently infected with influenza A virus were negative by PCR-EIA, as were samples from a volunteer infected with parainfluenza virus type 3. Nucleic acid amplification techniques represent important tools for the timely and sensitive diagnosis of influenza A virus infections and, therefore, their management and control.

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 March; 32(3): 623-628




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.