JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St-Laurent, G
Right arrow Articles by Archambault, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by St-Laurent, G
Right arrow Articles by Archambault, D
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 March; 32(3): 658-665

Detection of equine arteritis virus following amplification of structural and nonstructural viral genes by reverse transcription-PCR.

G St-Laurent, G Morin and D Archambault

Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des Sciences Biologiques, Québec, Canada.

ABSTRACT

A reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay was developed for the detection of equine arteritis virus (EAV) in cell culture supernatant and in horse semen. Four different sets of oligonucleotide primers complementary to sequences located in the 3' end of the polymerase gene (open reading frame [ORF] 1b) and to sequences representing the entire ORFs 3, 4, and 7, which encode for nonstructural (ORFs 3 and 4) or viral nucleocapsid (ORF 7) proteins, were compared for their abilities to amplify the targeted EAV sequences by the RT-PCR procedure. The sensitivities of the RT-PCR for amplification of EAV sequences located in the 3' end of ORF 1b and ORF 4 were 2 median tissue culture infective doses (TCID50s) of viral particles in the EAV-infected cell culture supernatant for both ORFs and 20 and 200 TCID50s of viral particles, respectively, in virus-containing horse semen. The sensitivities were much lower when primers complementary to ORFs 3 and 7 were used in the RT-PCR, with a minimum detection limit of only 2 x 10(4) TCID50s of viral particles in virally infected cell culture supernatant, as determined by analyzing the resulting RT-PCR products on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. The specificities of the RT-PCR assays for all primer sets tested were confirmed when the amplified cDNA products of the expected size reacted positively with the corresponding virus-specific digoxigenin-labeled cDNA probes in the chemiluminescence assays. Although the sensitivity of the RT-PCR for amplification of ORF 3 and 7 sequences was lower, all sets or primers were capable of amplifying several cell culture-adapted EAV field isolates when the virus was present in high enough quanities in the test sample. When horse semen samples were analyzed for the presence of EAV by the RT-PCR with primers specific to the ORF 1b 3' end and ORF 4 sequences and by virus isolation in cell cultures, there was 100% concordance among the assays. The RT-PCR assay targeting the 3' end of ORF 1b and/or ORF 4 EAV RNA may be an alternative to conventional methods for the diagnosis of EAV infection in horses.


J Clin Microbiol. 1994 March; 32(3): 658-665




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.