JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bodmer, T
Right arrow Articles by Matter, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bodmer, T
Right arrow Articles by Matter, L
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 June; 32(6): 1483-1487

Screening of respiratory tract specimens for the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test.

T Bodmer, A Gurtner, K Schopfer and L Matter

Institute for Medical Microbiology, University of Berne, Switzerland.

ABSTRACT

A prospective 2-month trial involving 617 respiratory tract specimens was conducted to compare sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the newly developed Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test kit (AMTDT; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and of fluorescent acid-fast staining versus combined BACTEC 12B and solid-medium cultures as the "gold standard." A total of 590 specimens were culture and AMTDT negative. Twenty-one (3.4%) cultures yielded M. tuberculosis. Of these, 15 (71.4%) were detected by AMTDT, whereas 6 (28.6%) were missed. M. tuberculosis did not grow in six (28.6%) of AMTDT-positive specimens derived from three patients under treatment for tuberculosis. AMTDT exhibited a sensitivity, a specificity, a negative predictive value, and a positive predictive value of 71.4, 99, 99, and 71.4%, respectively. In comparison, the same values for fluorescent microscopy were 66.7, 98.3, 98.8, and 58.3%, respectively. AMTDT was easy to perform and highly specific. However, a screening test would require an improved sensitivity and, when feasible, the implementation of an internal amplification control.


J Clin Microbiol. 1994 June; 32(6): 1483-1487




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.