This Article Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Uhaa, I J Articles by Williams, J C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Uhaa, I J Articles by Williams, J C

Evaluation of specificity of indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of human Q fever.

Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

ABSTRACT

Ninety-five acute- and convalescent-phase serum specimens from 48 patients suspected of having rickettsial or Legionella infections were assayed for antibodies to Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever. To evaluate the specificity of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for human Q fever, we compared the ELISA results with those of the indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) test. The ELISA data were analyzed by two different criteria for a positive test. The first criterion for positive results by ELISA was based upon diagnostic titers established in a study of 150 subjects who had no demonstrable cellular or humoral immune responses to C. burnetii phase I or phase II whole cells or phase I lipopolysaccharide. The second criterion was based upon diagnostic antibody titers in a study of 51 subjects who had been diagnosed as having clinical Q fever and had fourfold or greater rises in humoral immune responses to C. burnetii phase I and phase II whole-cell antigens. A comparison of the ELISA and IFA test results of the 95 serum specimens indicated excellent agreement between the tests (Kappa = 92.9%; P < 0.05). None of the 38 patients whose etiologies were confirmed serologically as Legionnaires' disease or rickettsial diseases other than Q fever were classified as positive for C. burnetii by the ELISA. Only one patient identified by the IFA test as having Q fever was not scored positive by the ELISA. These results suggest that the ELISA is useful for epidemiologic screening and as a diagnostic test for human Q fever.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Zhang, G., Kiss, K., Seshadri, R., Hendrix, L. R., Samuel, J. E. (2004). Identification and Cloning of Immunodominant Antigens of Coxiella burnetii. Infect. Immun. 72: 844-852 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Maurin, M., Raoult, D. (1999). Q Fever. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 518-553 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fournier, P.-E., Marrie, T. J., Raoult, D. (1998). Diagnosis of Q Fever. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1823-1834 [Full Text]