This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blasco, J M Articles by Moriyón, I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blasco, J M Articles by Moriyón, I

Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 August; 32(8): 1835-1840

Evaluation of allergic and serological tests for diagnosing Brucella melitensis infection in sheep.

Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Servicio de Investigación Agraria, Diputación General de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.

ABSTRACT

A total of 291 unvaccinated sheep from Brucella melitenesis-infected flocks were examined for delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses with Brucellergene commercial allergen and with cold saline extract and cytosol from rough B. melitensis 115, and their sera were tested in the rose bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with lipopolysaccharide. DTH reactions were maximal after 72 h, with no intensity differences among allergens, inoculation sites (eyelid and tail), and doses tested. There were no differences in the results recorded by visual inspection and palpation of inoculation sites, by measuring skin thickness with a caliper, or by microscopic examination of samples taken at necropsy. Six days after DTH testing, energy was observed in 100% of the animals, and 100% reactivity was recovered only after 24 days. All animals were necropsied, and thorough bacteriological searches were performed. The sensitivities found with the 140 animals from which B. melitensis was isolated were ELISA, 100%; DTH, 97.1%; RBT, 92.1%; and CFT, 88.6%. Those results put into question the value of RBT and CFT as screening and confirmatory tests for sheep brucellosis and at least indicate that their standardization should be modified. For 151 tested sheep from which B. melitensis was not isolated, the percentages of positive animals were ELISA, 100%; DTH, 94.0%; RBT, 57.6%; and CFT, 53.6%. All tests were negative for 100 tested sheep from Brucella-free flocks. The different results of bacteriological and immunological tests suggest the usefulness of developing indirect tests able to distinguish truly infected animals from those that have developed an immunological response.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Munoz, P. M., Marin, C. M., Monreal, D., Gonzalez, D., Garin-Bastuji, B., Diaz, R., Mainar-Jaime, R. C., Moriyon, I., Blasco, J. M. (2005). Efficacy of Several Serological Tests and Antigens for Diagnosis of Bovine Brucellosis in the Presence of False-Positive Serological Results Due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. CVI 12: 141-151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marin, C. M., Moreno, E., Moriyon, I., Diaz, R., Blasco, J. M. (1999). Performance of Competitive and Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays, Gel Immunoprecipitation with Native Hapten Polysaccharide, and Standard Serological Tests in Diagnosis of Sheep Brucellosis. CVI 6: 269-272 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alonso-Urmeneta, B., Marín, C., Aragón, V., Blasco, J. M., Díaz, R., Moriyón, I. (1998). Evaluation of Lipopolysaccharides and Polysaccharides of Different Epitopic Structures in the Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of Brucellosis in Small Ruminants and Cattle. CVI 5: 749-754 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mikolon, A. B., Gardner, I. A., Hietala, S. K., Hernandez de Anda, J., Chamizo Pestaña, E., Hennager, S. G., Edmondson, A. J. (1998). Evaluation of North American Antibody Detection Tests for Diagnosis of Brucellosis in Goats. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1716-1722 [Abstract] [Full Text]