JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, H
Right arrow Articles by Abe, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kato, H
Right arrow Articles by Abe, T
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 September; 32(9): 2067-2070

Application of typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to the study of Clostridium difficile in a neonatal intensive care unit.

H Kato, N Kato, K Watanabe, K Ueno, H Ushijima, S Hashira and T Abe

Institute of Anaerobic Bacteriology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Japan.

ABSTRACT

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of restriction pattern polymorphism was applied to type Clostridium difficile isolated from neonates hospitalized in a neonatal intensive care unit, and the results were compared with those of immunoblot analysis. C. difficile was isolated from fecal specimens of 41 (61%) of 67 neonates during a 5-month investigation. All of these neonates were asymptomatic. Fifty-five C. difficile isolates from 32 patients were analyzed by PFGE after digestion with SmaI and SacII endonucleases and by immunoblotting with 10 different antisera. Fifty-three of 55 isolates from 30 patients were identical by PFGE analysis after SmaI and SacII digestion and immunoblot analysis. Two isolates were different from each other and from the epidemic group by both PFGE and immunoblot analysis. All 53 epidemic isolates were nontoxigenic, while the two remaining isolates were toxigenic. These results suggest that nosocomial spread of nontoxigenic C. difficile infection in the neonatal intensive care unit and suggest that both PFGE and immunoblot are powerful typing tools for the epidemiological study of C. difficile.


J Clin Microbiol. 1994 September; 32(9): 2067-2070




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.