JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurley, J C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurley, J C
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 September; 32(9): 2120-2127

Concordance of endotoxemia with gram-negative bacteremia in patients with gram-negative sepsis: a meta-analysis.

J C Hurley

Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital & Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98105-0371.

ABSTRACT

The Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay is a sensitive method for detecting endotoxin. Using gram-negative (GN) bacteremia as the basis for comparison, concordance with endotoxemia in 45 studies could be expressed as an odds ratio. Calculation of summary odds ratios by the Mantel-Haenszel-Peto method indicated that the concordance of the results was no higher by the chromogenic LAL assay than by the gelation version, and the sensitivity was improved by only 11% (62 versus 51%). Endotoxemia was detected in 77 (68%) of 114 patients with bacteremia caused by an organism that was not a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae, whereas endotoxemia was detected in only 120 (45%) of 269 patients with bacteremia caused by a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae or an anaerobe (P < 0.001). This difference was also apparent for patients with GN bacteremia for whom a fatal outcome had been recorded. The prevalence of GN bacteremia in the tested population and the type of etiological agent are critical and previously unrecognized variables which affect the interpretation of the LAL test in patients with suspected sepsis.


J Clin Microbiol. 1994 September; 32(9): 2120-2127




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.