JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, B
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, B
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 September; 32(9): 2221-2224

Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.

B Holmes, M Costas, T Thaker and M Stevens

National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, England.

ABSTRACT

The BBL Crystal system (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) is a miniaturized bacterial identification method employing modified conventional and chromogenic substrates. Two products are currently available, the Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit and the Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit, each comprising thirty tests. We report an evaluation of both systems (using database version 1.1 for both) in the identification of 51 gram-negative taxa likely to be encountered commonly in the clinical laboratory. In all, 266 strains were tested in the Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit, and these represented 36 taxa of the family Enterobacteriaceae (188 strains), 5 oxidase-positive fermentative taxa (26 strains), and 10 nonfermentative taxa (52 strains). The majority of these same strains (203 of 266) were also tested in the Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit. The Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit performed as follows: Enterobacteriaceae, 93% correct, 6% not identified, and 1% incorrect; oxidase-positive fermenters, 88, 12, and 0%, respectively; and nonfermenters, 100% correct, although several only to the genus or group level. The Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit gave the following results: Enterobacteriaceae, 91% correct, 7% not identified, and 2% incorrect; oxidase-positive fermenters, 80, 13, and 7%, respectively (but results were based on only 15 strains); and nonfermenters, 100% correct (but results were based on only 11 strains). We found the systems extremely easy and rapid to use, and for the Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit an identification rate of 100% in 40 of 51 taxa was achieved, with corresponding figures of 29 of 39 taxa for the Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit.


J Clin Microbiol. 1994 September; 32(9): 2221-2224




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.