JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Espy, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Espy, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jan 1995, 41-44, Vol 33, No. 1
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of three methods for extraction of viral nucleic acids from blood cultures

MJ Espy, R Patel, CV Paya and TF Smith
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

Reliable nucleic acid extraction techniques for blood specimens are required for the sensitive detection of viral DNA. Standardized procedures for processing blood specimens for the molecular detection of herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus [CMV], herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]) have not been established. Three methods were used to extract DNA from blood specimens from healthy donors and asymptomatic immunocompromised patients: (i) IsoQuick treatment of whole blood, (ii) extraction of the peripheral blood leukocytes by lysis (lysis buffer and proteinase K), and (iii) extraction of peripheral blood leukocytes with phenol- chloroform (sodium docecyl sulfate solution and proteinase K). All blood specimens from 25 healthy blood donors were negative for CMV, herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus nucleic acid sequences, regardless of the extraction method, while three samples (12%) extracted by the lysis technique were positive for EBV DNA. Of 25 blood samples from asymptomatic immunocompromised patients, CMV and EBV each were detected in nine specimens by lysis extraction, four each by IsoQuick and four (CMV) and six (EBV) by the phenol-chloroform method. Our results indicate that the lysis method is optimal for the detection of CMV and EBV DNA sequences by PCR from the leukocytic fraction of blood specimens. DNA of these viruses is frequently present in blood specimens from asymptomatic immunocompromised patients and occasionally from healthy donors.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.