This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ostergaard, L. Articles by Moller, J. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ostergaard, L. Articles by Moller, J. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 10 1995, 2620-2623, Vol 33, No. 10
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay

L Ostergaard and JK Moller
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

A procedure for use of the Amplicor Chlamydia PCR with the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) medium was developed, and the performance of the Syva MicroTrak EIA was evaluated by use of PCR and the Syva MicroTrak direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) as confirmatory methods. PCR detected Chlamydia organisms at a 10-fold greater dilution than did DFA. Of 366 specimens, 119 specimens were positive by both PCR and DFA, 6 specimens were positive only by PCR, and 241 specimens were negative by both PCR and DFA. Subsequently, DFA and the developed PCR procedure were used prospectively for confirmation of EIA results in a defined negative gray zone between the cutoff value and 30% of the cutoff value (70% below the cutoff value). All specimens with results above the EIA cutoff value were also subjected to confirmation with DFA and PCR. EIA was performed on 7,748 endocervical swab specimens, of which 494 (6.4%) were subjected to confirmation, and on 968 male urethral swab specimens, of which 185 (19.1%) were subjected to confirmation. A "gold standard" was based on the findings by DFA and PCR, and divergent results were resolved by a major outer membrane protein-based PCR. Forty-five of 160 female specimens (28.1%) and 11 of 93 male specimens (11.8%) within the defined negative gray zone were found to be positive. Of 334 female specimens having absorbance unit (AU) values above the EIA cutoff value, 258 could be confirmed, thereby giving a positive predictive value of 77% (258/334). Accordingly, the positive predictive value with male specimens was 95% (87/92). The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis- positive specimens was 3.9% (303/7,748) in females and 10.1% (98/968) in males.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kjar, H O, Dimcevski, G, Hoff, G, Olesen, F, Ostergaard, L (2000). Recurrence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection evaluated by mailed samples obtained at home: 24 weeks' prospective follow up study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 76: 169-172 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Newhall, W. J., Johnson, R. E., DeLisle, S., Fine, D., Hadgu, A., Matsuda, B., Osmond, D., Campbell, J., Stamm, W. E. (1999). Head-to-Head Evaluation of Five Chlamydia Tests Relative to a Quality-Assured Culture Standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 681-685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Østergaard, L., Andersen, B., Olesen, F., Møller, J. K (1998). Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study. BMJ 317: 26-27 [Full Text]  
• Andersen, B., Østergaard, L., Møller, J. K, Olesen, F. (1998). Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study. BMJ 316: 350-351 [Full Text]  
• Dean, D, Ferrero, D, McCarthy, M (1998). Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent- antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection [In Process Citation]. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 94-99 [Abstract] [Full Text]