This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sloan, L. Articles by Rosenblatt, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sloan, L. Articles by Rosenblatt, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 12 1995, 3124-3128, Vol 33, No. 12
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunoassay for serological diagnosis of cysticercosis

L Sloan, S Schneider and J Rosenblatt
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

We evaluated a commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) from LMD Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif., for the detection of antibodies in serum to the cysticercus of Taenia solium. The ELISA was performed on 308 serum samples; 198 from a pool of healthy individuals, 42 from patients who had antibodies against a variety of parasites other than T. solium, and 68 from patients suspected of having cysticercosis. All of these 68 specimens were tested both by the ELISA and by an immunoblot method (enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay [EITB]) developed at the Parasitic Serology Laboratory of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Twenty-seven of the 68 serum samples from patients suspected of having cysticercosis were positive by both EITB and ELISA, while 31 were negative by both assays. ELISA results for three and two samples were considered false positive and false negative, respectively, when compared with the results of EITB. Results for an additional five samples were considered equivocal but were technically positive because their optical density readings were slightly above the cutoff value. Three of the 198 serum samples from the bank of serum samples from healthy individuals were also false positive by ELISA (the EITB result for the samples was negative). Six other serum samples from healthy individuals which had equivocal results and the five serum samples from patients with equivocal results were EITB negative. Serum samples containing antibodies against Echinococcus spp. frequently cross-reacted with the cysticercus ELISA antigen (13 of 16 specimens), but serum samples with antibodies against other parasites did not (2 of 26 specimens); all of these serum samples were EITB negative. The commercially available ELISA that we describe is a simple and rapid test. Considering all 308 specimens, the ELISA had a specificity of 93% (when samples with equivocal results were considered negative) or 89% (when samples with equivocal results were considered positive); the sensitivity was 93%.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sako, Y., Nakao, M., Ikejima, T., Piao, X. Z., Nakaya, K., Ito, A. (2000). Molecular Characterization and Diagnostic Value of Taenia solium Low-Molecular-Weight Antigen Genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 4439-4444 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hubert, K., Andriantsimahavandy, A., Michault, A., Frosch, M., Muhlschlegel, F. A. (1999). Serological Diagnosis of Human Cysticercosis by Use of Recombinant Antigens from Taenia solium Cysticerci. CVI 6: 479-482 [Abstract] [Full Text]