This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kuipers, J. G. Articles by Zeidler, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kuipers, J. G. Articles by Zeidler, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Dec 1995, 3186-3190, Vol 33, No. 12
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid

JG Kuipers, K Scharmann, J Wollenhaupt, E Nettelnbreker, S Hopf and H Zeidler
Department of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

Routine microbiological diagnosis of Chlamydia-induced reactive arthritis is based mainly on the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with urogenital swabs or in urine. Because chlamydial antigen, rRNA, and DNA are present in low quantities in the inflamed joint, highly sensitive assays are needed to detect C. trachomatis not only at the primary site of infection but also in peripheral blood and peripheral blood leukocytes, which are suspected carriers for dissemination, and in synovial fluid. To evaluate possible tools for this purpose, the sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, Chlamydia EIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for the detection of defined numbers of purified C. trachomatis elementary bodies (EB) in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid were determined. In urine, PCR detected 2, MicroTrak and ChlamydiaEIA detected 2 x 10(3), and PACE 2 and IDEIA detected 2 x 10(4) EB per ml. In peripheral blood, only PCR and MicroTrak detected C. trachomatis, with detection limits of 100 and 2 x 10(7) EB per ml, respectively. For peripheral blood leukocytes, the detection limits were 2 EB per ml for PCR and 2 x 10(4) EB per ml for MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2. In synovial fluid, PCR detected 200, MicroTrak and IDEIA detected 2 x 10(5), and PACE 2 detected 10(6) EB per ml. ChlamydiaEIA was unable to detect 2 x 10(6) EB per ml in synovial fluid. In summary, PCR was found to be the most sensitive method. The sensitivities of the other methods tested were at least 1,000 times lower than that of PCR. PCR should therefore be considered a most promising tool for routine diagnosis of Chlamydia-induced arthritis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Satta, A., Stivala, A., Garozzo, A., Morello, A., Perdichizzi, A., Vicari, E., Salmeri, M., Calogero, A. E. (2006). Experimental Chlamydia trachomatis infection causes apoptosis in human sperm. Hum Reprod 21: 134-137 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Solomon, A. W., Peeling, R. W., Foster, A., Mabey, D. C. W. (2004). Diagnosis and Assessment of Trachoma. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 982-1011 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Freise, J, Gerard, H C, Bunke, T, Whittum-Hudson, J A, Zeidler, H, Kohler, L, Hudson, A P, Kuipers, J G (2001). Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction. Ann Rheum Dis 60: 140-145 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kuipers, J. G, Nietfeld, L., Dreses-Werringloer, U., Koehler, L., Wollenhaupt, J., Zeidler, H., Hammer, M. (1999). Optimised sample preparation of synovial fluid for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Ann Rheum Dis 58: 103-108 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dean, D, Ferrero, D, McCarthy, M (1998). Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent- antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection [In Process Citation]. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 94-99 [Abstract] [Full Text]