JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Engelenburg, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Oirschot, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Engelenburg, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Oirschot, J. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 02 1995, 308-312, Vol 33, No. 2
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Excretion of bovine herpesvirus 1 in semen is detected much longer by PCR than by virus isolation

FA Van Engelenburg, FW Van Schie, FA Rijsewijk and JT Van Oirschot
Department of Virology, Institute for Animal Science and Health, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

To compare the sensitivities of PCR and virus isolation and to examine the course of virus excretion in semen, we intrapreputially inoculated eight bulls with bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) and used two bulls as sentinels. From these bulls, we collected a large panel of semen samples during 65 days postinfection (dpi). At 44 dpi the bulls received dexamethasone to reactivate putatively latent virus. We analyzed the semen samples by virus isolation on egg yolk-extended semen (VIE test), by virus isolation on fresh semen (VIF test), and by a PCR test on egg yolk-extended semen. Of the 162 semen samples that were collected, the VIE test scored 24 positive, the VIF test scored 51 positive, and the PCR test scored 118 positive. At 6 dpi all samples from the inoculated bulls were found to be positive by all three tests. From 9 to 44 dpi most samples were found to be negative by both virus isolation tests but positive by the PCR test. From 48 to 55 dpi the dexamethasone treatment induced virus reactivation, which was evidenced by an increase in the number of positive VIE, VIF, or PCR tests. From 58 to 65 dpi all samples were found to be negative in both virus isolation tests, but several samples were still found to be positive by the PCR test. To determine whether BHV1 DNA was present in the dorsal root ganglia of the infected bulls, we analyzed by PCR several thoracic, lumbar, and sacral ganglia collected at 65 dpi.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.