This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rohner, P. Articles by Auckenthaler, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rohner, P. Articles by Auckenthaler, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Feb 1995, 313-317, Vol 33, No. 2
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system

P Rohner, B Pepey and R Auckenthaler
Laboratoire Central de Bacteriologie, Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve, Switzerland.

The BacT/Alert (Organon Teknika Corp., Durham, N.C.) is an automated blood culture system. It is based on the detection of CO2 by means of a colorimetric sensor internally attached to the bottom of culture bottles. The aerobic and anaerobic media of this system were compared with one bottle of the Signal system (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, United Kingdom). At bedside, 20 ml of blood was drawn from each adult patient. The two BacT/Alert bottles were inoculated with 5 ml of blood each; the Signal bottle was inoculated with 10 ml. A total of 5,284 sets (2,483 patients; 2.1 cultures per patient) consisting of three bottles each were evaluated, of which 781 sets (14.8%) revealed microorganisms (n = 892); 642 of these were considered to be pathogenic. Significantly more (P < 0.0001) pathogens were isolated from the two BacT/Alert bottles together (n = 584) than from the single Signal bottle (n = 515). Escherichia coli (P = 0.007), gram-negative bacteria other than members of the family Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas spp. (P = 0.006), and yeasts (P = 0.02) were isolated more often from both or either BacT/Alert bottle. Comparing the systems in terms of 388 different organisms per septic episode, the difference between BacT/Alert and Signal was significant for the total number of septicemia cases (P = 0.003). More contaminants grew in the BacT/Alert system (173 versus 116; P = 0.0001). False-positive indications were more frequent in the BacT/Alert system, 198 (3.7%) aerobic bottles and 57 (1.1%) anaerobic bottles, than in the Signal bottles, 24 (0.5%) bottles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

• van der Vorm, E. R., Dondorp, A. M., van Ketel, R. J., Dankert, J. (2000). Apparent Culture-Negative Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Caused by Peptostreptococcus magnus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 4640-4642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Doern, G. V., Barton, A., Rao, S. (1998). Controlled Comparative Evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A Aerobic Media as Means for Detecting Bacteremia and Fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 2686-2689 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ziegler, R., Johnscher, I., Martus, P., Lenhardt, D., Just, H.-M. (1998). Controlled Clinical Laboratory Comparison of Two Supplemented Aerobic and Anaerobic Media Used in Automated Blood Culture Systems To Detect Bloodstream Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 657-661 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Denton, M., Kerr, K. G. (1998). Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Infection Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11: 57-80 [Abstract] [Full Text]