JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, F.
Right arrow Articles by Maroto, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, F., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Maroto, M. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Feb 1995, 413-415, Vol 33, No. 2
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis B virus DNA based on anti-double-stranded DNA

F Garcia Jr, F Garcia, MC Bernal, A Leyva, G Piedrola and MC Maroto
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Spain.

We have evaluated a new enzyme immunoassay technology to detect the products of PCR-based amplification that may be applicable to routine testing of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. Two hundred eight serum samples were studied: 73 were basal samples and 135 were sequential serum samples from patients with chronic hepatitis, some of whom were being treated with alpha interferon. We compared the new detection method (PCR-DNA enzyme immunoassay [DEIA]) with dot blot hybridization performed without prior PCR amplification and with two other methods for detection of PCR products: agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining (PCR-EB) and dot blot (PCR-dot blot). For hepatitis B-antigen-positive basal samples, HBV DNA was detected in 70.4% by dot blot, 74.1% by PCR-EB, and 100% by PCR-DEIA and PCR-dot blot; for anti-hepatitis B e-antigen basal samples, HBV DNA was found in 10.5% by dot blot and PCR-EB and in 42.1% by PCR-DEIA and PCR-dot blot. Chi-square tests showed a strong association between dot blot and PCR-EB and between PCR-DEIA and PCR dot blot. Using PCR-dot blot as the reference, dot blot shows a 56.9% sensitivity and a 100% specificity, PCR-EB shows a 55.0% sensitivity and a 100% specificity, and PCR-DEIA shows a 95.4% sensitivity and a 97% specificity. We conclude that the technical advantages of the DEIA method and its high sensitivity and specificity may facilitate the use of PCR in routine testing for HBV DNA in clinical microbiology laboratories.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.