Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 02 1995, 416-418, Vol 33, No. 2
KS Kehl, H Cicirello and PL Havens
Newly available assays offer alternatives to conventional microscopic
examination for Cryptosporidium spp. We compared two enzyme immunoassays,
ProSpect Cryptosporidium microtiter assay (Alexon, Inc., Mountain View,
Calif.) and Color Vue Cryptosporidium assay (Serady, Indianapolis, Ind.),
and a direct immunofluorescent assay, Merifluor Cryptosporidium kit
(Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, Ohio), with acid- fast Kinyoun-staining
for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. Examinations were performed on
129 stool specimens received from patients during a recent waterborne
outbreak. A specimen was considered positive when organisms could be
identified visually by acid-fast and immunofluorescent stains or if
organisms could be visualized by either acid-fast or immunofluorescent
stain and detected by both enzyme immunoassays. The final number of
positive specimens was 55. No single procedure detected all 55 positive
specimens. Of these, ProSpect and Color Vue detected 52 (sensitivity,
94.5%), and the Kinyoun stain and Merifluor detected 53 (sensitivity,
96.4%). The final number of negative specimens was 74. One false-positive
result was seen with both the Kinyoun stain and the ProSpect assay. The
Color Vue and ProSpect assays required the most hands-on technologist time.
The ProSpect assay and Merifluor kit were easiest to perform. The acid-fast
stain was difficult to interpret. The Merifluor kit was easiest to read and
was adaptable to both batch and single testing. Overall, the Kinyoun stain
and the Merifluor test were preferable to both of the enzyme immunoassays
because of the high reagent cost and hands-on time required for the enzyme
immunoassays. The difficult interpretation of the Kinyoun stain smears made
the Merifluor a more desirable test despite its higher cost.(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of four different methods for detection of Cryptosporidium species
Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|