JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hook, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hook, E. W., 3rd

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 02 1995, 455-457, Vol 33, No. 2
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic

KR Smith, S Ching, H Lee, Y Ohhashi, HY Hu, HC Fisher 3rd and EW Hook 3rd
University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294-0006.

The high sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests such as ligase chain reaction (LCR) has the potential to simplify specimen collection for the microbiologic diagnosis of gonorrhea. We screened first-void urine specimens from 283 women attending a Birmingham, Ala., sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic by using LCR and compared the results to those of cervical and urethral cultures for gonorrhea diagnosis. Fifty-three (18.7%) women had positive cervical cultures for gonorrhea, and 41 of the 53 (77%) also had positive urethral cultures. One additional patient had only a positive urethral culture (the cervical gonorrhea culture was negative). LCR testing of urine specimens for gonorrhea yielded positive results for 51 of 54 (94.4%) women with positive cervical or urethral cultures. Of 229 women with both urethral and cervical cultures negative for gonorrhea, 2 (0.8%) had positive urine LCR results as well. To resolve the discrepancies between urine LCR and culture results, LCR tests of simultaneously collected urethral and cervical swab specimens and LCR tests of the same urine specimens using different nucleotide primers were conducted. After evaluation of five discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of LCR for the detection of gonorrhea in urine specimens were 94.6%, 100%, 100%, and 98.7%, respectively. We conclude that urine LCR testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a practical alternative to culture for the detection of gonorrhea in women. Urine testing for STD diagnosis has the potential to simplify and expand the opportunities for STD screening and surveillance of women.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.