Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 03 1995, 535-540, Vol 33, No. 3
AL Colombo, F Barchiesi, DA McGough and MG Rinaldi
The use of Etest strips for antimicrobial susceptibility testing is a new
and promising method with broad applications in microbiology. Since these
strips contain a predefined continuous gradient of a drug, it is possible
to obtain a reproducible, quantitative MIC reading. We performed a
prospective and double-blinded study to compare the Etest and National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (Villanova, Pa.) broth
macrodilution methods for determining the MICs of fluconazole,
itraconazole, and ketoconazole for 100 clinical isolates (25 Candida
albicans, 25 Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, 20 Torulopsis
[Candida] glabrata, 15 Candida tropicalis, and 15 Candida parapsilosis).
The Etest method was performed according to the manufacturer's
instructions, and the reference method was performed according to National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document M27-P guidelines.
Despite differences between results for some species-drug combinations,
Etest and macrobroth MICs were, in general, in good agreement. The MIC
agreement rates for the two methods, within +/- 1 dilution, were 71% for
ketoconazole, 80% for fluconazole, and 84% for itraconazole. According to
our data, Etest has potential utility as an alternative method.
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|