This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Welby, P. L. Articles by Storch, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Welby, P. L. Articles by Storch, G. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1995, 1084-1088, Vol 33, No. 5
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of automated Difco ESP blood culture system with biphasic BBL Septi-Chek system for detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients

PL Welby, DS Keller and GA Storch
Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

We compared the Difco ESP 384 blood culture system with the pediatric Septi-Chek system for the detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients. A total of 10,762 blood culture sets included an ESP aerobic bottle and a Septi-Chek bottle. From these cultures, a total of 278 organisms classified as probable pathogens were isolated, including 237 from ESP bottles and 221 from Septi-Chek bottles. This difference was not statistically significant. More organisms classified as possible contaminants were also isolated from ESP bottles (for ESP, 480 bottles; for Septi-Chek, 418 bottles; P < 0.01). The time to detection was shorter for probable pathogens isolated from ESP bottles (median times for organisms isolated from both systems: ESP, 14.0 h; Septi-Chek, 34.5 h; P < 0.001). The proportions of all probable pathogens detected by 24 and 48 h after inoculation were 78 and 96%, respectively, for ESP compared with 31 and 74%, respectively, for Septi- Chek. The time to final identification was also shorter for organisms grown in ESP bottles (median times for organisms isolated from both systems: ESP, 48.8 h; Septi-Chek, 58.5 h; P < or = 0.001). A subset of 4,442 cultures also included an ESP anaerobic bottle in addition to an ESP aerobic bottle and a Septi-Chek bottle. There were no significant differences in the recovery of probable pathogens by any of the possible two bottle combinations, but five anaerobic pathogens were recovered only in the anaerobic bottle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

• McGowan, K. L., Foster, J. A., Coffin, S. E. (2000). Outpatient Pediatric Blood Cultures: Time to Positivity. Pediatrics 106: 251-255 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Garcia-Prats, J. A., Cooper, T. R., Schneider, V. F., Stager, C. E., Hansen, T. N. (2000). Rapid Detection of Microorganisms in Blood Cultures of Newborn Infants Utilizing an Automated Blood Culture System. Pediatrics 105: 523-527 [Abstract] [Full Text]