JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zervos, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zervos, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jun 1995, 1554-1557, Vol 33, No. 6
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of field inversion gel electrophoresis with contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis as a typing method for Enterococcus faecium

M Green, K Barbadora, S Donabedian and MJ Zervos
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Direct comparisons between contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) electrophoresis and field inversion gel electrophoresis (FIGE) to determine the epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant enterococci have not been previously published. Fifty non-beta-lactamase-producing, ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates and 10 vancomycin- resistant E. faecium strains collected from multiple centers were analyzed in a blinded fashion by CHEF electrophoresis and FIGE after digestion with SmaI. Isolates were considered clonally related if there was a difference of three of fewer bands between electrophoretic patterns. Agreement between CHEF electrophoresis and FIGE was seen for 12 of 13 identified groups of ampicillin-resistant E. faecium and 7 of 7 groups of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. The lone discordance was accounted for by a fourth band difference between two strains recognized near 350 kb by CHEF electrophoresis but not by FIGE, placing them into different clonal groups. Better band separation was noted in the 50- to 200-kb range for FIGE, while CHEF electrophoresis revealed better resolution over 250 kb more reliably, including detection of some bands not seen on FIGE. Molecular epidemiologic investigations of E. faecium by either technique should provide comparable results.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.