JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felmlee, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Persing, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felmlee, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Persing, D. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 06 1995, 1617-1623, Vol 33, No. 6
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Genotypic detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampin resistance: comparison of single-strand conformation polymorphism and dideoxy fingerprinting

TA Felmlee, Q Liu, AC Whelen, D Williams, SS Sommer and DH Persing
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Detection of mutations in the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be used as an accurate predictor of rifampin resistance in the majority of strains tested. Simple but highly accurate screening methods must be developed for the detection of these mutations. Either DNA sequence analysis or single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) screening can be used to detect rpoB mutations, but these techniques either are expensive or yield results that may prove difficult to interpret when used in a clinical setting. This report describes the use of dideoxy fingerprinting (ddF) as a postamplification screening method to identify rifampin-resistant genotypes. The ddF protocol was performed on the amplified rpoB fragment with no preparatory steps, thus making ddF practical for laboratories equipped for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. When compared with the results of SSCP analysis, ddF results were more easily interpreted and contained more sequence- dependent information that facilitated differentiation of functionally significant and silent mutations. The ddF method was used for genotypic determination of rifampin susceptibility of 20 multidrug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis. The results of this analysis were concordant with DNA sequence analysis and conventional clinical laboratory methods.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.