Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 07 1995, 1760-1764, Vol 33, No. 7
JR Biehle, SJ Cavalieri, MA Saubolle and LJ Getsinger
MICs of amikacin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline,
and imipenem were determined by Etest for 100 clinical strains of rapidly
growing mycobacteria and compared with MICs determined by a reference agar
dilution method. Etest MICs were also determined by an alternative inoculum
application (agar overlay) method and compared with MICs determined by the
inoculum application method recommended by the manufacturer (swabbing).
Agreement between Etest and agar dilution MICs within +/- 1 log2 dilution
was 85% (511 of 600), and agreement within +/- 2 log2 dilutions was 97%
(580 of 600). The rate of complete category agreement was 88%, and rates of
major and minor errors were 2.2 and 11.7%, respectively. No very major
errors were detected for Etest MICs. Interlaboratory agreement between MICs
determined at two separate laboratories was 81% (121 of 149) within +/- 1
log2 dilution and 92% (137 of 149) within +/- 2 log2 dilutions. Agreement
between laboratories by interpretive category was 92%. Exact agreement
between agar overlay and swab application MICs was 52.3%, and agreement
within +/- 1 log2 dilution was 82.3%. Diffuse ellipse edges and trailing
growth were still a problem with the overlay method, and in some cases
results were more difficult to interpret than they were with the
corresponding swab-prepared plate. In summary, our data suggest that Etest
may be an accurate and reproducible method for determining susceptibility
of rapidly growing mycobacteria.
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Etest for susceptibility testing of rapidly growing mycobacteria
Department of Pathology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|