This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hellinger, W. C. Articles by Cockerill, F. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hellinger, W. C. Articles by Cockerill, F. R., 3rd

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 07 1995, 1787-1790, Vol 33, No. 7
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systems

WC Hellinger, JJ Cawley, S Alvarez, SF Hogan, WS Harmsen, DM Ilstrup and FR Cockerill 3rd
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.

The performance characteristics of the Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and the BacT/Alert (Organon Teknika Corporation, Durham, N.C.) aerobic blood culture systems were compared for 6,009 blood culture sets obtained from patients with suspected bloodstream infections. The BacT/Alert aerobic bottle [BTA(O2)] was continuously agitated while it was incubated in 5% CO2 at 36 degrees C; culture plates prepared from the Isolator tube [I(O2)] were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 degrees C. From 394 blood cultures, 416 clinically significant isolates of bacteria and yeasts were recovered. The overall yields for BTA(O2) and I(O2) were not significantly different (319 versus 336; P = 0.20). I(O2) recovered significantly more staphylococcus (P < 0.05) and yeast isolates (P < 0.01). BTA(O2) recovered significantly more aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (P < 0.05). In blood culture sets which produced growth of the same organisms in both the BTA(O2) and I(O2) systems, the BTA(O2) system detected growth sooner, but more rapid identification was possible with the I(O2) system by virtue of earlier isolation of colonies on solid media.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mirrett, S., Reller, L. B., Petti, C. A., Woods, C. W., Vazirani, B., Sivadas, R., Weinstein, M. P. (2003). Controlled Clinical Comparison of BacT/ALERT Standard Aerobic Medium with BACTEC Standard Aerobic Medium for Culturing Blood. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2391-2394 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Procop, G. W., Cockerill, F. R. III, Vetter, E. A., Harmsen, W. S., Hughes, J. G., Roberts, G. D. (2000). Performance of Five Agar Media for Recovery of Fungi from Isolator Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3827-3829 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Denton, M., Kerr, K. G. (1998). Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Infection Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11: 57-80 [Abstract] [Full Text]