Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 07 1995, 1804-1806, Vol 33, No. 7
FS Nolte, B Metchock, T Williams, L Diem, A Bressler and FC Tenover
We compared penicillin MICs obtained with three different commercially
available broth microdilution panels (MicroScan, Sensititre, and Pasco)
with MICs obtained with reference microdilution panels for 20 well-
characterized pneumococci with decreased susceptibilities to penicillin (7
resistant and 13 intermediate). All panels were supplemented with 2 to 5%
lysed horse blood (LHB) prepared in-house. Additional supplements included
fastidious inoculum broth (FIB) for MicroScan panels and commercially
prepared LHB (Difco) for Pasco panels. The percentages of
penicillin-resistant strains (MIC 2 micrograms/ml) detected by the
different methods follow: MicroScan-FIB, 0; MicroScan-LHB 0; Pasco in-
house LHB, 71; and Sensititre-LHB, 100. The percentages of intermediate
strains (MIC = 0.1 to 1.0 micrograms/ml) detected by the different methods
follow: MicroScan-FIB, 31; MicroScan-LHB 23; Pasco in-house LHB, 46; and
Sensititre-LHB, 85. Difco LHB supplement failed to support the growth of
86% of the strains in the Pasco panels. Of the commercially available
panels evaluated, only Sensititre, supplemented with LHB prepared in-house
could reliably detect penicillin-resistant pneumococci.
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with commercially available broth microdilution panels
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|