This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stone, D. L. Articles by Sinor, L. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stone, D. L. Articles by Sinor, L. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jan 1997, 217-222, Vol 35, No. 1
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Capture-S, a nontreponemal solid-phase erythrocyte adherence assay for serological detection of syphilis

DL Stone, MC Moheng, S Rolih and LT Sinor
Immucor, Inc., Norcross, Georgia 30071, USA.

A solid-phase erythrocyte adherence assay has been developed for the serological detection of reagin antibodies in syphilis. Capture-S (Immucor, Inc., Norcross, Ga.) is a nontreponemal, qualitative screening test for the detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antilipid antibodies in serum or plasma samples from blood donors. The Capture-S assay utilizes a modified Venereal Disease Research Laboratory antigen bound to microtitration wells and anti-IgG- plus anti-IgM-coated indicator erythrocytes as the detection system. The Capture-S assay was evaluated at six separate sites on 10,942 specimens. For patient samples of clinically diagnosed syphilis categories (n = 366), the Capture-S assay yielded a sensitivity of 80.7% versus 80.3% for the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) card test (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.). In comparative experiments on patient and donor samples (n = 10,222), the Capture-S assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% compared to 91.2% for the RPR card test. The Capture-S and RPR card tests produced essentially equivalent specificities of 99.2% and 99.3%, respectively, for this sample population. For five test sites, the Capture-S and RPR card test demonstrated a 98.3% agreement (10,085 of 10,264) of test results. These evaluations indicate that the Capture-S compares favorably to the RPR card test in assay sensitivity and specificity, with the added benefits of ease of use, accommodation of high-volume testing, and potential for automation.