JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pantosti, A.
Right arrow Articles by D'Ambrosio, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pantosti, A.
Right arrow Articles by D'Ambrosio, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 10 1997, 2482-2486, Vol 35, No. 10
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Detection of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis by PCR

A Pantosti, M Malpeli, M Wilks, MG Menozzi and F D'Ambrosio
Laboratory of Bacteriology and Medical Mycology, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy. pantosti@net.iss.it

Strains of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) are associated with diarrhea in young farm animals and, at least in particular settings, in children. Enterotoxin production by ETBF is currently detected by a tissue culture assay with HT-29 cells. We have developed a PCR assay based on the detection of the enterotoxin gene to identify ETBF in culture and in stool samples. Overall, 113 bacterial strains were examined, including 3 B. fragilis reference strains, 75 B. fragilis isolates (comprising 40 ETBF isolates), 20 Bacteroides spp. other than B. fragilis, and 15 strains belonging to other genera. Complete agreement was found between the results of the tissue culture assay and those of the PCR for our strains. PCR was also used to detect ETBF directly in fecal samples. Stools from two healthy volunteers were spiked with known numbers of ETBF and were processed by three different methods. A culture method, which required inoculation of the stools on selective plates and the collection of the whole bacterial growth ("sweeps"), was found to be the most sensitive. PCR performed with the plate sweeps yielded amplification products with a detection limit of 10(5) to 10(4) CFU/g of feces. By this method 18 samples of diarrheic stools (10 positive and 8 negative for ETBF) were examined. The results of the PCR were in accordance with the culture results in all cases. The proposed PCR assay represents a diagnostic tool for the rapid identification of ETBF in culture as well as in fecal samples.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.